Joshua W. Brown, PhD, Professor at Indiana University and Director and Co-founder of the Global Medical Research Institute | Indiana University
+ Pharmaceuticals
Patient Daily | Jun 10, 2026

Study finds five-minute prayer session reduces pain and anxiety in primary care patients

A randomized controlled trial at the University of Maryland School of Medicine found that a five-minute session of proximal intercessory prayer, delivered in person by a trained volunteer, significantly reduced pain and anxiety among primary care patients compared to those who listened to soft music. The results were published in the May/June 2026 issue of Annals of Family Medicine.

The study enrolled 180 patients from a university family medicine practice who reported clinically significant pain or anxiety. After their medical appointments, participants were randomly assigned to receive either five minutes of Christian intercessory prayer—including laying-on-of-hands—or five minutes of soft music as a control. Researchers followed up with participants at two and six weeks.

Prayer is the most common form of complementary medicine in the United States, used by 43% of Americans with 62% identifying as Christian. Despite its prevalence, few rigorous clinical trials have examined in-person intercessory prayer. This study is one of the first well-powered randomized controlled trials on proximal intercessory prayer conducted within a standard primary care setting.

"The prayer intervention was effective regardless of the patient's faith or no faith," said Joshua W. Brown, PhD, Professor at Indiana University and Director and Co-founder of the Global Medical Research Institute. "Our findings add to research showing how prayer changes brain function in ways that promote health." Brown has authored a new book titled Proving a Miracle (Harper, 2026), which explores his personal experience with healing prayer following his own diagnosis with a brain tumor over twenty years ago.

Researchers noted that while their patient population was predominantly Black, female, and low-income—reflecting the clinic's base—this limits broader generalizability. They also acknowledged that blinding participants or practitioners was not possible without compromising ecological validity; thus, placebo effects or non-specific factors such as human presence cannot be ruled out entirely. The authors recommend future studies include control conditions involving interpersonal contact without prayer to better isolate specific effects.

Organizations in this story