Politics can be a challenging topic to discuss, especially during election season when conversations about political matters become more frequent. A psychiatrist from Baylor College of Medicine offers advice on how to navigate these discussions calmly with family, friends, and colleagues.
Dr. Asim Shah, professor and executive vice chair in the Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Baylor, emphasizes the importance of considering the environment before making political statements. "Look at the environment in which you are making a political statement," he advises. "Everyone should be careful about what they say – especially in the workplace."
Shah highlights that listening is crucial in any political conversation. He notes that workplace conversations require stricter boundaries because words can be misinterpreted and potentially impact one's job. In personal settings with family and friends, he recommends listening to understand different viewpoints without feeling compelled to argue or persuade others.
"If we understand that we cannot change someone else’s views, the conversation will be easier. Give everyone space and listen to all sides," Shah explains.
When discussions become intense or unproductive, Shah suggests using a time limit: “If you feel the discussion is getting repeatedly heated in three to five minutes, stop and change the subject or go do something else.” This approach helps prevent arguments and preserves relationships.
Respect is another key element in these discussions. Participants should allow each other to speak and listen respectfully to avoid conflicts.
In group settings where tensions rise, Shah recommends mediation by acknowledging all sides before taking a break: “I hear your side, now let’s hear the other person’s side, then we can sleep on it.”
Finally, Dr. Shah warns against assuming correctness when entering political discussions: “Anyone who starts the political discussion thinks they’re right, and that is the problem.” Instead of challenging others without facts, he suggests acknowledging their points and committing to further research if needed.
Election stress is common but manageable through respectful dialogue that values diverse perspectives over confrontation.
